亚洲香蕉一本大道日韩在线,亚洲偷自偷白图片,亚洲AV永久无码精品国产精品

寫作大作文范文|政府投資方向話題的雅思范文。雅思寫作中大作文占的比重頗高，話題涵蓋學術、生活等各個領域。賦能網(wǎng)對歷年常見的雅思作文考題進行分析，為廣大考生提供范文與解析，以下就是賦能小編為您整理的：雅思寫作大作文范文|政府投資方向話題的雅思范文。

Topic: Some people argue that the government should spend money on public services and facilities, but not on the arts. Do you agree or disagree?

政府投資公共設施的原因

符合公眾的利益(general interest)，給人們帶來方便;

一般來說，私人企業(yè)(private sector)不會對公共設施感興趣，因此公共設施只能依靠政府投資。而藝術作為人們的愛好和文化傳統(tǒng)(cultural traditions)，會代代相傳(passed on from one generation to another)，因此不需要政府投資。

政府投資藝術的原因

藝木對現(xiàn)代生活是至關重要的(essential to modern life)，對于一個文明社會有著非常重要的作用(central to a civilized society)，藝術品傳播的是語言所不能傳播的東西(Works of art convey the ineffable.)，是人們文化生活的主要部分(an integral part of cultural life); ?藝術給人們提供了排解情緒的渠道(provide positive outlets)，比如看電影和聽音樂; ?藝術是一種民族文化，保護藝術有助于保護一種文化(preserve a culture);藝術可以吸引外國游客觀光(attract foreign tourists for sightseeing)，產生旅游收入(produce tourism revenue);

一些藝術作品(art objects)，譬如說雕塑和建筑(sculpture and architecture)，使人們享受城市或者郊區(qū)風景的美麗(enjoy the beauty of urban or rural landscape)，賞心悅目(pleasing to the eye)，為生活增添情趣。

范文

The role of arts in modern life is unique, providing people with entertainment and yielding various psychological rewards, such as relief from stress. Despite these benefits, the arts have been taken as luxury goods in many cases. It is suggested that public money of a city should be concentrated in projects like public facilities, which arc more likely to bring immediate benefits to the public, rather than the arts. There are a number of facts indicating that this position is right.

Public facilities, widely accepted as one of the main precursors to a citys development, should be one of the highest priorities. Those underdeveloped cities in particular, should direct sufficient funding toward public facilities. While municipal office buildings, courthouses and post offices are essential components of public services, libraries, hospitals, parks, playing fields, gymnasiums and swimming pools are available to the public for social, educational, athletic and cultural activities. By boosting spending on public facilities, cities are more capable to satisfy the needs of citizens and improve their standard of living.

In addition to social benefits, there are economic merits that public facilities can offer to communities. An integrated transport network (maritime, land and inland waterways transport and civil aviation)， for example, promises the smooth and speedy movement of goods and people in a city. Industrial products, as well as agricultural produce of a city, can be delivered to other cities in exchange for steady income. Of equal importance are public Internet facilities. Providing access to information by improving Internet and other telecommunications facilities has relevance to the ease with which businesses in a city receive, process, utilize and send information. It is no exaggeration to say that entrepreneurs, either from home or abroad, will first examine the infrastructure of a city before deciding whether to pursue business opportunities there.

The arts, by comparison, although enabling people to see the world and the human condition differently and to see a truth one might ignore before, do not merit government spending. The first reason is that the arts--- referring to music, film and literature altogether are more likely to attract the investment of the private sector than public facilities. Business people continue to invest in the arts in the expectation of earning lump sum income and the arts in return, continue to flourish without the government spending. Meanwhile, the arts are a key component of a culture and naturally passed down from one generation to another. Unlike public facilities, they require no money to survive.

It is therefore clear that construction of public facilities should be given the foremost consideration. The concern about the well-being of individual citizens and that of a city is more acute than the apprehension about the survival and prospects of the arts, something that businesses have a stake in.